Received: 15.01.2023 Published: 15.01.2023
UDC: 338.012 DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-1-36-44
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the main conditions that ensure the influence of science on innovation, especially in terms of technological innovation. Comparative and structural analysis, application of measurement procedures, and evaluation of empirical data constitute the methodology of the study. The results of the study can be reduced to a number of provisions confirmed by analysis. Firstly, in Russia, in the course of permanent reorganizations, the institutional, informational, funding, and even personnel potential (due to a reduction in the number of researchers) was greatly weakened. Thus, the impact of scientific knowledge on the innovation process was clearly reduced, although the thesis that innovations are always results of scientific activities is difficult to dispute. Secondly, we should not talk about it as a direct relationship, but through the time lags. It is they who become a stumbling block in the conducting and planning current scientific and technological policy. Thirdly, the author has showed the main problems of technological innovation in Russia, identified in the course of many years of author’s research, supporting the important conclusion about the lack of an accurate representation and measurement of the level of technological effectiveness of the economy. The author has also proposed to solve this problem by detailing and improving accounting and statistical procedures in the field of technology, e. g., by means of technological maps, as well as by introducing an indicator as technology coverage of relevant objects (enterprises, regions, etc.). The current piece measurement of technologies does not consider coverage. Such an omission causes a significant distortion in the assessment of the technological level, as well as in further studies of the relationship between basic science, R&D, and technological development.
Keywords
Agencies
Данное исследование выполнено без внешнего финансирования.How to cite
Для цитирования:
Чичканов В.П., Сухарев О.С. Возможности науки в инновационном развитии: «измерение технологий» // Экономика науки. 2023. Т. 9, № 1. С. 36–44. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-1-36-44
For citation:
Chichkanov V.P., Sukharev O.S. Possibilities of Science in Innovative Development: “Measuring Technologies” // Economics of Science. 2023. Vol. 9, no. 1. P. 36–44. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-1-36-44
Коды статьи
- УДК 338.012
- SPIN-код Сухарев О. С.: 9463-8370
How to Cite
Chichkanov V.P., Sukharev O.S. Possibilities of Science in Innovative Development: “Measuring Technologies” // Economics of Science. 2023. Vol. 9, no. 1. P. 36–44. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-1-36-44
References
- Глазьев С. Ю. Рывок в будущее. Россия в новых технологическом и мирохозяйственном укладах. Москва: Книжный мир, 2018. 768 с.
- Сухарев О. С. Стратегия инновационного развития: агенты и национальные проекты в России // Инвестиции в России. 2019. № 5. С. 3–14.
- Сухарев О. С. Научный продукт: решение проблемы оценки результативности науки // Эргодизайн. 2021. № 2. С. 110–117. doi: 10.30987/2658-4026-2021-2-110-117
- Чичканов В. П., Сухарев О. С. Рейтинги в управлении экономикой: информативность и целесообразность // Научный вестник ОПК России. 2021. № 3. С. 72–82. doi: 10.52135/2410–4124_2021_3_72
- Чичканов В. П., Сухарев О. С., Воробьёва М. В. Научно-технологическое развитие России: проблемы измерения в региональном разрезе // Научный Вестник ОПК России. 2022. № 3. С. 74–79.
- Иванов В. В. Новая научно-техническая политика // Экономическое возрождение России. 2022. № 3(73). С. 24–28. doi: 10.37930/1990-9780-2022-3-73-24-28
- Иванов В. В. Реформы российской науки: истоки, итоги, перспективы // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества Росси. 2021. Т. 232. № 6. С. 82–96. doi:10.38197/2072-2060-2021-232-6-82-96
- Малинецкий Г. Г. Не стоит возвращаться в XVI век. Проектирование будущего // Проблемы цифровой реальности. 2022. № 1(5). С. 43–64. doi: 10.20948/future-2022–4
- Weber A. The role of education in knowledge economies in developing countries // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011. Vol. 15. P. 2589–2594. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.151
- Lu Ya. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues // Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2017. Vol. 6. P. 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005
- Su H.-N., Moaniba I. M. Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. Vol. 122. P. 12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.024
- Nazarko J., Ejdys J. Structural Analysis as an instrument for identification of critical drivers of technology development // Procedia Engineering. 2017. Vol. 182. P. 474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.137
