Levels of Digital Maturity of Regional Governance

Received: 15.01.2025 Published: 15.01.2025

UDC: 351.711

Abstract

Decree of the President of Russia No. 1014 has identified ‘digital maturity of state and municipal management’ as one of the key indicators of the effectiveness of senior officials in the subjects of the Russian Federation. A unified assessment of digital maturity is particularly critical at the level of regional authorities. The purpose of this study is to develop a framework for assessing the levels of digital maturity within regional governance. The study employed the method of systemic logical analysis and the structural-functional approach to examine regional management teams and the functions of regional managers. The information base for the study comprises articles indexed in the global ScienceDirect database and the national eLIBRARY database, using search keywords such as ‘levels of digital maturity of regional authorities.’ As a result of the research, a typology of six levels of digital maturity in regional governance has been proposed: absence, existence, application, utilization of digital technologies, replacement of managerial functions with digital technologies, and autonomous regional governance without human involvement. The study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting an objective analysis of digital maturity by evaluating the proportion of management decisions based on digital technologies. Furthermore, the article examines the evolving role of regional leaders in the decision-making process through the integration of digital technologies, transitioning from decision-making without considering digitalization to becoming architects of digital processes and technologies. The study also highlights that the determination of digital maturity levels in regional government bodies can be achieved through the method of transactional tomography. The findings contribute to the theoretical foundation for assessing the digitalization processes within territorial governance structures.

Keywords

Agencies

Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда и Правительства Свердловской области № 24-18-20036, https://rscf.ru/project/24-18-20036/

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Попов Е.В. Уровни цифровой зрелости региональной власти // Экономика науки. 2025. Т. 11, № 1. С. 10–22.

For citation:

Popov E.V. Levels of Digital Maturity of Regional Governance // Economics of Science. 2025. Vol. 11, no. 1. P. 10–22.

Коды статьи

  • УДК 351.711
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
  • SPIN-код Попов Е. В.: 9980-7417

How to Cite

Popov E.V. Levels of Digital Maturity of Regional Governance // Economics of Science. 2025. Vol. 11, no. 1. P. 10–22.

References

  1. Abramov, V.I., & Andreev, V.D. (2022). Assessment of the digital maturity of the public administration in the regions: the US experience and development in Russia. Informatization in the Digital Economy, 3(2), 43–62. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.18334/ide.3.2.115106
  2. Abramov, V.I., & Andreev, V.D. (2023). Digital ecosystem of the region: Structural components and operational efficiency. Ars Administrandi, 15(2), 251–271. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2023-2-251-271
  3. Anufrieva, A.A., & Krasnodubskaya, K.S. (2023). Digital transformation and assessment of the Russian Federation region public administration system’s “digital maturity”. Baikal Research Journal, 14(3), 1069–1086. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17150/2411–6262.2023.14(3).1069–1086
  4. Bolshakova, K.Y., & Klimova, A.V. (2022). Regional management centers as a new form of management activity. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 9(4), 391–400. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2022-9-4-391-400
  5. Kasyanov, S.V. (2019). Digital transformation as a new driver of growth performance in the public sector and municipal administration. Regional Problems of Economic Transformation, (9), 5–12. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2019-9-5-12
  6. Kochetkov, D.M. (2023). Modern trends in research assessment: The case of the Netherlands. Economics of Science, 9(3), 76–88. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2023-9-3-76-88
  7. Popov, E.V., Simonova, V.L., & Cherepanov, V.V. (2021). Digital maturity levels of an industrial enterprise. Journal of New Economy, 22(2), 88–109. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-2-5
  8. Popov, E.V., Chelak, I.P., & Kavetsky, S.A. (2024). Tomography of the territorial economic ecosystem’s sustainable development. Human Progress, 10(3), 4–26. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.34709/IM.1103.4
  9. Sukharev, O.S. (2024a). Technological substitution: The key control modes. Upravlenets/The Manager, 15(2), 66–78. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-2-5
  10. Sukharev, O.S. (2024b). “Economics of technology” as a scientific field: retrospective and prospective aspects. Economics of Science, 10(1), 41–53. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2024-10-1-41-53
  11. Sukharev, O.S. (2024c). Sustainable development: “Acumulative effect” and “Distributed management”. Economic Science today: Collection of scientific articles (Issue 20, pp. 7–19). BNTU. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2024-20-7-19
  12. Ahokangas, P., Matinmikko-Blue, M., Yrjölä, S., & Hämmäinen, H. (2021). Platform configurations for local and private 5G networks in complex industrial multi-stakeholder ecosystems. Telecommunications Policy, 45(5), 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102128, EDN: ANXMWR
  13. Carolis, A., Macchi, M., Negri, E., & Terzi, S. (2017). A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. In H. Lödding, R. Riedel, K.-D. Thoben, G. von Cieminski, & D. Kiritsis (Eds.), Advances in production management systems: The path to intelligent, collaborative and sustainable manufacturing (Vol. 513, pp. 13–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_2
  14. Chang, J., Kadry, S.N., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (2020). Review and synthesis of Big Data analytics and computing for smart sustainable cities. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(11), 1363–1370. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2020.0006, EDN: NCJPWO
  15. Colovic, A., Caloffi, A., Rossi, F., & Russo, M. (2025). Institutionalizing the digital transformation: The role of digital innovation intermediaries. Research Policy, 54(1), 105146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105146
  16. Dikhanbayeva, D., Shaikholla, S., Suleiman, Z., & Turkyilmaz, A. (2020). Assessment of Industry 4.0 maturity models by design principles. Sustainability, 12(23), 9927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239927, EDN: FJGGOX
  17. Duba, W., & Maria, E.D. (2023). Assessment and support of the digitalization of businesses in Europe during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(1), 12717. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12717, EDN: YFCVOJ
  18. Dwivedi, Y.K., Hughes, L., Kar, A.K., Baabdullah, A.M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., Andreini, D., Abumoghli, I., Barlette, Y., & Bunker, D. (2022). Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456, EDN: NICSIS
  19. Fischer-Presler, D., Bonaretti, D., & Bunker, D. (2024). Digital transformation in disaster management: A literature review. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 33(4), 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101865, EDN: LPVKNL
  20. Klötzer, C., & Pflaum, A. (2017). Toward the development of a maturity model for digitalization within the manufacturing industry’s supply chain. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4210–4219. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.509
  21. Kochetkov, D., Vuković, D., Sadekov, N., & Levkiv, H. (2019). Smart cities and 5G networks: An emerging technological area? Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 69(3), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1903289K, EDN: OMQXMK
  22. Konopik, J., Jahn, C., Schuster, T., Hoßbach, N., & Pflaum, A. (2022). Mastering the digital transformation through organizational capabilities: A conceptual framework. Digital Business, 2(2), 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100019, EDN: PCQZHM
  23. Kretschmer, T., Leiponen, A., Schilling, M., & Vasudeva, G. (2022). Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3250, EDN: UIUHRX
  24. Kuvayeva, Y.V. (2019). Digital economy: Concepts and Russia’s readiness to transition. Journal of the Ural State University of Economics, 20(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-1-3, EDN: PPLLVB
  25. Langen, P.W. (2023). The strategy of the port development company: A framework based on the business ecosystems perspective and an application to the case of Port of Rotterdam. Maritime Transport Research, 4, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2023.100089, EDN: BDUGFA
  26. Langley, D.J., Rosca, E., Angelopoulos, M., Kamminga, O., & Hooijer, C. (2023). Orchestrating a smart circular economy: Guiding principles for digital product passports. Journal of Business Research, 169, 114259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114259, EDN: OKTJVX
  27. Marciano, A., Nicita, A., & Ramello, G.B. (2020). Big data and big techs: Understanding the value of information in platform capitalism. European Journal of Law and Economics, 50, 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09675-1, EDN: BMDGMV
  28. Pasalic, I.N., & Cukusic, M. (2024). Understanding E-participation adoption: Exploring technological, organizational, and environmental factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, 123633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123633, EDN: TXKEVY
  29. Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., & Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973, EDN: WWGYYP
  30. Philipp, R. (2020). Digital readiness index assessment towards smart port development. Sustainability Management Forum, 28, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00501-5, EDN: TUBOPO
  31. Popov, E.V. (2008). Transaction function. International Advances in Economic Research, 14, 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-008-9185-4, EDN: RHMZOJ
  32. Restas, A., Tsakiris, A., Tsotakis, C., Kondodina, T., Giakoumoglou, N., Pechlivani, E.M., Tzovaras, D., & Ioannidis, D. (2024). A collaborative AR/VR platform for social manufacturing. Procedia Computer Science, 237, 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.160, EDN: FNLAKK
  33. Roth, T., Stohr, A., Amend, J., Fridgen, G., & Rieger, A. (2023). Blockchain as a driving force for federalism: A theory of cross-organizational task-technology fit. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102476, EDN: EOPKLP
  34. Sala-Vilaró, L.R., Li-Ying, J., & Traunecker, T. (2024). How do innovation intermediaries’ business models cope with their need to develop new digital services? Technovation, 131, 102950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102950, EDN: OTZMVJ
  35. Senna, P.P., Roca, J.B., & Barros, A.C. (2023). Overcoming barriers to manufacturing digitalization: Policies across EU countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122822, EDN: DSAAGZ
  36. Shojaei, R.S., & Burgess, G. (2022). Non-technical inhibitors: Exploring the adoption of digital innovation in UK construction industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122036, EDN: FEIBGZ
  37. Sorri, K., Yrjonkoski, K., & Seppanen, M. (2024). Smart cities, smarter values: Unpacking the ecosystem of urban innovation. Technology in Society, 77, 102499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102499, EDN: NGJXWI
  38. Utama, D.R., Hamsal, M., Abdinagoro, S.B., & Rahim, R.K. (2024). Developing a digital transformation maturity model for port assessment in archipelago countries: The Indonesian case. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 26, 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101146, EDN: VXBUFZ
  39. Uzunca, B., Sharapov, D., & Tee, R. (2022). Governance rigidity, industry evolution and value capture in platform ecosystem. Research Policy, 51(7), 104560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104560, EDN: MWPCQD
  40. Villanueva-Merino, A., Urra-Uriarte, S., Izkara, J.L., Campos-Cordobés, S., Aranguren, A., & Molina-Costa, P. (2024). Leveraging local digital twins for planning age-friendly urban environments. Cities, 155, 105458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105458, EDN: GWHAIM
  41. Weber, C., Königsberger, J., Kassner, L., & Mitschang, B. (2017). M2DDM – A maturity model for data driven manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 63, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.309