Integral index of digitalization efficiency in the system of analyzing business ecosystem development

12+ Submit an article

Received: 15.01.2026 Published: 15.01.2026

UDC: 334.784 EDN: OBDLZH

Abstract

In the context of the accelerating digital transformation of the manufacturing sector of the Russian economy, a methodological gap persists in understanding the impact of digitalization on the performance efficiency of enterprises and business ecosystems. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodological framework for the integrated assessment of digitalization efficiency (the diffusion and application of digital technologies) within the core of an industrial ecosystem by accounting for the combined economic, operational, technical, social, and market effects. The methodological foundation of the research is based on the principles of the systems and process approaches, the concepts of enterprise digital maturity and managed business ecosystems, as well as the principles of lean production and digital management. The methodological framework includes a quantitative tool developed by the authors – an integral digitalization efficiency index (IIE), constructed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), normalization procedures, and weighted additive aggregation. The empirical basis of the study is represented by a case study of a B2B engineering (machine-building) enterprise. The results demonstrate a stable growth of the integral index, indicating a systemic effect of digitalization and the company’s transition from localized improvements to a mature phase of a digital ecosystem. In future research, the integrated approach may be further developed toward greater accuracy and practical applicability, enabling the transformation of the index from an analytical indicator into a sustainable managerial decision-making tool under conditions of a changing external environment. At the same time, a key limitation of the methodology is identified: the growth of the integral digitalization index should be interpreted as the result of a comprehensive transformation of enterprise activities, within which digitalization represents a significant, but not the sole, factor influencing the observed effects.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Попов Е.В., Симонова В.Л., Зырянов А.С. Интегральный индекс эффективности цифровизации в системе анализа развития бизнес-экосистемы // Экономика науки. 2026. Т. 12, № 1. С. 86–105.

For citation:

Popov E.V., Simonova V.L., Zyrianov A.S. Integral index of digitalization efficiency in the system of analyzing business ecosystem development // Economics of Science. 2026. Vol. 12, no. 1. P. 86–105.

Коды статьи

  • УДК 334.784
  • EDN OBDLZH
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)

How to Cite

Popov E.V., Simonova V.L., Zyrianov A.S. Integral index of digitalization efficiency in the system of analyzing business ecosystem development // Economics of Science. 2026. Vol. 12, no. 1. P. 86–105.

References

  1. Абрамов, В.И., Гордеев, В.В., & Столяров, А.Д. (2024). Цифровая трансформация промышленных предприятий в цифровые бизнес-экосистемы: структурные компоненты и практические аспекты реализации. Фундаментальные исследования, (9), 78–85. EDN: EFIZBI, https://doi.org/10.17513/fr.43680
  2. Васильева, Е.В. (2023). Методология исследования возможностей цифровых платформ и экосистем: Опыт применения Platform Innovation Kit. Современные информационные технологии и ИТ-образование, 19(1), 24–35. EDN: AHQXPS, https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.019.202301.024-035
  3. Каленов, О.Е. (2023). Оценка эффективности деятельности бизнес-экосистем в цифровой экономике. Вестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова, 20(1(127)), 162–174. EDN: VJXTRC, https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2023-1-162-174
  4. Ковалев, В. Е., Ярошевич, Н. Ю., & Комарова, О. В. (2025). Цифровое будущее машиностроения: Оценка потенциала формирования платформенных рынков. Управленец, 16(1), 35–47. EDN: IYNDUH, https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2025-16-1-3
  5. Нигай, Е.А. (2023). Формирование цифровых экосистем бизнеса в условиях развития информационного общества: Управленческий аспект. Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 15(3), 353–376. EDN: OFEWBY, https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2023-3-353-376
  6. Попов, Е.В., Симонова, В.Л., & Зырянов, А.С. (2024). Эволюция бизнес-экосистем в промышленности: от классического типа к цифровым. Информатизация в цифровой экономике, 5(3), 341–360. EDN: LVPLGO, https://doi.org/10.18334/ide.5.3.121748
  7. Попов, Е.В., Симонова, В.Л., & Зырянов, А. С. (2025a). Формирование стратегии цифровизации бизнесэкосистемы промышленного предприятия. Экономика и управление, 31(5), 576–592. EDN: TBAVVS, https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-5-576-592
  8. Попов, Е.В., Симонова, В.Л., & Зырянов, А.С. (2025b). Индекс интегральной эффективности цифровой платформенной бизнес-экосистемы. Экономика промышленности, 18(3), 405–420. EDN: NBPLIG, https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2025-3-1440
  9. Alhassan, M., & Adam, I. (2021). The effects of digital inclusion and ICT access on the quality of life: A global perspective. Technology in Society, (64), 101511. EDN: LNZOSV, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101511
  10. Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433–1450. EDN: ZDHGRI, https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16274
  11. Björkdahl, J. (2020). Strategies for digitalization in manufacturing firms. California Management Review, 62(4), 17–36. EDN: NXYFTB, https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620920349
  12. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M., & Kim, H.H. (2011). Strength in numbers: How does data-driven decision making affect firm performance? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2011) (pp. 541–558). Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1819486
  13. Cubric, M. (2020). Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technology in Society, (62), 101257. EDN: DJMDBS, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257
  14. Deepu, T.S., & Ravi, V. (2021). Exploring critical success factors influencing adoption of digital twin and physical internet in electronics industry using grey-DEMATEL approach. Digital Business, 1(2), 100009. EDN: LCWWVT, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100009
  15. Hanelt, A., Busse, S., & Kolbe, L.M. (2017). Driving business transformation toward sustainability: Exploring the impact of supporting IS on the performance contribution of eco-innovations. Information Systems Journal, 27(4), 463–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12130
  16. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesbock, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123–139.
  17. Jovanovic, M., Sjodin, D., & Parida, V. (2022). Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation, (118), 102218. EDN: GDZUGD, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218
  18. Madanaguli, A., Parida, V., Sjodin, D., & Oghazi, P. (2023). Literature review on industrial digital platforms: A business model perspective and suggestions for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (194), 122606. EDN: WFJTBI, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122606
  19. Meng, F., & Wang, W. (2020). Research on the mechanism of digitalization to the improvement of manufacturing enterprises performance based on mediating effect. In 2020 6th IEEE International Conference on Information Management (ICIM) (pp. 122–126). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.244683
  20. Nandkumar, A., Mani, D., & Bharadwaj, A. (2018). Market returns to digital innovations: A group based trajectory approach. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 15241. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.15241abstract
  21. Park, Y., & Saraf, N. (2016). Investigating the complexity of organizational digitization and firm performance: A set-theoretic configurational approach. In Proceedings of the 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS2016). Association for Information Systems.
  22. Rymaszewska, A., Helo, P., & Gunasekaran, A. (2017). IoT powered servitization of manufacturing: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Production Economics, (192), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.016
  23. Rungi, M. (2019). Digitalization: Size doesn’t matter, put focus on product-and-service, not on process. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 741–745). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978749
  24. Sener, E., & Yuksel, A.N. (2017). The reflections of digitalization at organizational level: industry 4.0 in Turkey. Pressacademia, 6(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2017.688
  25. Sia, S.K., Soh, C., & Weill, P. (2016). How DBS Bank pursued a digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 105–121.
  26. Steele, K., Carmel, Y., Cross, J., & Wilcox, C. (2009). Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making. Risk Analysis, 29(1), 26–33. EDN: MMJGDH, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01130.x
  27. Verhoef, P.C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J.Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. EDN: BUXXSM, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
  28. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). The nine elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 1–6.
  29. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 165–179.

Articles

All articles