Comprehensive assessment of the status scientific and technical projects using Technology Project Readiness Level

12+ Submit an article

Received: 11.01.2017 Published: 11.01.2017

DOI: 10.22394/2410-132x-2016-2-4-244-260

Abstract

The balanced methodology for assessing the Technology Project Readiness Level for commercialization (TPRL) is proposed. TPRL allows to determine the dynamics and balance of development projects that use the standardized approaches used in assessing the readiness of the technology. Validation of the methodology undertaken for the projects of Federal target programs “Research and development on priority directions of development of scientific-technological complex of Russia for 2007–2013” and “Research and development on priority directions of development of scientific-technological complex of Russia for 2014–2020”. The obtained results showed the possibility of application of the methodology for the evaluation of projects, improving efficiency of expert activity in the evaluation of projects, monitoring the status of individual project and group of projects (portfolio). The application of the methodology allowed us to improve the management of individual project and portfolio of projects.
Methodology TPRL will allow the implementers, industry partners, investors, and innovative industrial companies to improve the efficiency of its activities.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Петров А.Н., Сартори А.В., Филимонов А.В. КОМПЛЕКСНАЯ ОЦЕНКА СОСТОЯНИЯ НАУЧНО-ТЕХНИЧЕСКИХ ПРОЕКТОВ ЧЕРЕЗ УРОВЕНЬ ГОТОВНОСТИ ТЕХНОЛОГИЙ // Экономика науки. 2017. Т. 2, № 4. С. 244–260. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132x-2016-2-4-244-260

For citation:

Petrov A.N., Sartory A.V., Filimonov A.V. Comprehensive assessment of the status scientific and technical projects using Technology Project Readiness Level // Economics of Science. 2017. Vol. 2, no. 4. P. 244–260. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132x-2016-2-4-244-260

How to Cite

Petrov A.N., Sartory A.V., Filimonov A.V. Comprehensive assessment of the status scientific and technical projects using Technology Project Readiness Level // Economics of Science. 2017. Vol. 2, no. 4. P. 244–260. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132x-2016-2-4-244-260

References

  1. Распоряжение Правительства РФ от 8 декабря 2011 г. № 2227-р. (2011) Стратегия инновационного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2020 года. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_123444.
  2. Mankins J.C. (1995) Technology readiness levels / Advanced Concepts Office of Space Access and Technology NASA. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/trl/trl.pdf.
  3. Robert G.C., Scott J.E. (2006) Stage-Gate® and the Critical Success Factors for New Product Development // ВPTrends. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/07–06-ART-Stage-GateForProductDev-Cooper-Edgett.pdf.
  4. Открытые инновации. Ноучно-техническая кооперация (2011) / Открытое Акционерное Общество «Вертолёты России». http://www.skolkovo.ru/public/media/documents/rd/helicopters.pdf.
  5. Automotive Technology and Manufacturing Readiness Levels (2011) A guide to recognised stages of development. http://www.automotivecouncil.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Automotive-Technology-and-Manufacturing-Readiness-Levels.pdf.
  6. Bockenheimer C. (2010) The Airbus SHM Development Process // 2nd International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace. З. We.4. A.2.
  7. Стукало Ю. Е., Артёменко В.Б., Нестеров Д.В. (2012) Подход к оценке уровня готовности результатов интеллектуальной деятельности для их практического внедрения в образцы техники военного и гражданского назначения” // Межотраслевая информационная служба. № 3/2012 С. 21–29.
  8. Бухарин С. Н., Гукасов В. М., Лазаренко Н. Е. (2011) Теоретические и методические основы экспертизы фундаментальных и прикладных научно-технических проектов // Инноватика и экспертиза. № 2 (7). С. 58–66.
  9. Плетнев К.И., Лазаренко Н.Е. (2003) Экспертиза в научно-технической сфере: методология и организация. М.: Изд-во РАГС.
  10. The TRL Scale as a Research & Innovation Policy Tool (2014) / EARTO Recommendations. http://www.earto.eu/fileadmin/content/03_Publications/The_TRL_Scale_as_a_R_I_Policy_Tool_-_EARTO_Recommendations_-_Final.pdf.
  11. Graettinger C.P., Caroline P. et al. (2002) Using the Technology Readiness Levels Scale to Support Technology Management in the DOD’s ATD/STO Environments (A Findings and Recommendations Report Conducted for Army CECOM). http://resources.sei.cmu.edu/library/asset-view.cfm?assetID=5835.
  12. Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Guidance (2011) United States Department of Defense. http://www.acq.osd.mil/chieftechnologist/publications/docs/TRA2011.pdf.
  13. Technology readiness levels (TRL) (2014) Horizon 2020 – work programme 2014–2015 General Annexes / European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/annexes/h2020-wp1415-annex-gtrl_en.pdf.
  14. Technology Readiness Levels (2015) / Public Works and Government Services Canada. https://buyandsell.gc.ca/initiatives-and-programs/canadian-innovation-commercialization-program-cicp/programspecifics/technology-readiness-level.
  15. Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook. Version 2.0 (2011) / OSD Manufacturing Technology Program. May, 2011.
  16. Sauser B., Sauser B., Verma D., Ramirez-Marquez H., Gove R. (2006) From TRL to SRL: The Concept of System Readiness Levels / Proceedings of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER). Los Angeles, CA, USA. April 7–8, 2006.
  17. 2014 Technology Readiness Assessment. Clean coal research program (2015) / National Energy Technology Laboratory – US Department of Energy. 144 p.

Articles

All articles