TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED COMPANY: METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF STATUS DETERMINATION

12+ Submit an article

Received: 26.05.2018 Published: 26.05.2018

DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X-2017-4-1-30-46

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a survey of indicators and criteria on the basis of which foreign and Russian companies can be classified as technologically advanced and innovative. We compared the approaches used by international and domestic analytical companies to identify and rank technologically advanced companies, as well as lists of companies that ranked first in the various ratings of 2017–2018. A hypothesis was confirmed that there is no single methodologically valid approach to identifying high-tech companies in the world. It is shown that the lists of companies that are the leaders of global ratings of innovative companies in the world are weakly correlated and depend on the set of indicators used.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Ерёмченко О.А. ТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКИ РАЗВИТАЯ КОМПАНИЯ: МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЯ СТАТУСА // Экономика науки. 2018. Т. 4, № 1. С. 30–46. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-4-1-30-46

For citation:

Yeremchenko O.A. TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED COMPANY: METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF STATUS DETERMINATION // Economics of Science. 2018. Vol. 4, no. 1. P. 30–46. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-4-1-30-46

How to Cite

Yeremchenko O.A. TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED COMPANY: METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF STATUS DETERMINATION // Economics of Science. 2018. Vol. 4, no. 1. P. 30–46. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-4-1-30-46

References

  1. Поддержка частных высокотехнологических компаний-лидеров «Национальных чемпионов» (2018) / РВК. https://www.rvc.ru/eco/p2/strategic_agenda/102912.
  2. Jaegers T., Lipp-Lingua C., Amil D. (2013) Hightechnology and medium-high technology industries main drivers of EU-27’s industrial growth // Eurosts. Statistics in Focus 1/2013. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Archive:High-technology_versus_low-technologymanufacturing#cite_note-2.
  3. The 2017 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (2018) / European Commission – Joint Research Centre. http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard17.html.
  4. The Most Innovative Companies (2017) / Forbes. 12.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/innovativecompanies/#36acb6fc1d65.
  5. HOLT (2018) / Credit Suisse. 14.02.2018. https://www.credit-suisse.com/sites/holt/en.html.
  6. Jeff D., Gregersen H. (2017) How We Rank The Most Innovative Companies 2017 // Forbes. 08.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2017/08/08/how-we-rank-the-most-innovative-companies-2017/#69cb7bdd5c46.
  7. Kauflin J. (2017) The World’s Most Innovative Growth Companies 2017 // Forbes. 17.05.2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2017/05/17/the-worlds-most-innovativegrowth-companies-2017/#b2731a645ca7.
  8. Methodology. 2017 Top 100 Global Innovators (2018) / Clarivate Analytics. http://top100innovators.clarivate.com/content/methodology.
  9. Top 100 Global Innovator 2017 (2018) / Clarivate Analytics. https://clarivate.com/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/Clarivate-Analytics-2017-Top-100-Global-Innovators.pdf.
  10. 50 Smartest Companies 2017 (2018) / MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/lists/companies/2017.
  11. Strategy&’s 2017 Global Innovation 1000 study Methodology (2018) / Pw C. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000-UK#VisualTabs3.
  12. The Most Innovative Companies 2018 (2018) / Boston Consulting Group. http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/BCG-Most-Innovative-CompaniesJan-2018_tcm27–180700.pdf.
  13. Drucker Institute’s company ranking – 2017 (2018) / Drucker Institute. 12.02.2018. http://www.drucker.institute/rankings-2017.
  14. Methodology for the Management Top 250 Company Rankings (2017) / The Wall Street Journal. 05.12.2017. https://www.wsj.com/articles/methodology-for-the-management-top-250-companyrankings-1512482700.
  15. Principles underlying The Drucker Institute’s company ranking (2018) / Drucker Institute. 12.02.2018. http://www.drucker.institute/rankings-principles.
  16. The Most Innovative Companies (2017) / Forbes. 12.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/innovativecompanies/#36acb6fc1d65.
  17. Рейтинг инновационных регионов России: версия 2017 (2018) / АИИР. http://www.i-regions.org/images/files/airr17.pdf.
  18. Рейтинг ТехУспех 2017. Методология (2018) / ТехУспех. http://www.ratingtechup.ru/about/methodology.

Articles

All articles