Using the Methodology for the Comprehensive Assessment of Scientific and Technological Projects to Estimate Risks of their Failure

12+ Submit an article

Received: 26.07.2021 Published: 26.07.2021

UDC: 338.28 DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-1-19-38

Abstract

The article proposes approaches to assessing the risk of non-implementation of scientific and technological projects, based on the analysis of data from institutions for innovative development of information, and carried out following the requirements of a comprehensive assessment of projects’ technological readiness. One of the approaches presented allows you to build a matrix for subsequent analysis that describes the possibility of a project oving to a higher level of development, and the second is based on identifying empirical dependencies between the level of readiness of the project being executed and the risk of violating its deadlines. Examples of applying  the developed approaches for practical tasks on program activities of target programs in the field of research and development in priority areas of the scientific and technological complex of Russia are given. The described models are intended for use in the governing bodies of innovative development institutions to increase the implemented support programs’ efficiency.

Keywords

Agencies

Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Министерства науки и высшего образования России за счёт средств субсидии на выполнение государственного задания (проект № 075-01395-20-01).

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Комаров А.B., Комаров К.А., Шуртаков К.В. Использование методологии комплексной оценки научно-технологических проектов для оценки рисков их невыполнения // Экономика науки. 2021. Т. 7, № 1. С. 19–38. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-1-19-38

For citation:

Komarov A.V., Komarov K.A., Shurtakov K.V. Using the Methodology for the Comprehensive Assessment of Scientific and Technological Projects to Estimate Risks of their Failure // Economics of Science. 2021. Vol. 7, no. 1. P. 19–38. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-1-19-38

Коды статьи

  • УДК 338.28

How to Cite

Komarov A.V., Komarov K.A., Shurtakov K.V. Using the Methodology for the Comprehensive Assessment of Scientific and Technological Projects to Estimate Risks of their Failure // Economics of Science. 2021. Vol. 7, no. 1. P. 19–38. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-1-19-38

References

  1. Air Force Instruction 90-802. Risk Management (2019) www.e-Publishing.af.mil.
  2. NASA Risk Management Handbook (2011) / NASA. http://ntrs.nasa.gov.
  3. Project Management in Research and Development. White Paper (2010) / EFCOG.
  4. ГОСТ Р 56275-2014 (2016) Менеджмент рисков. Руководство по надлежащей практике менеджмента рисков проектов / Техэксперт. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200118641.
  5. ГОСТ Р ИСО/МЭК 31010—2011. Менеджмент риска. Методы оценки риска (2011) / Техэксперт. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200090083.
  6. Mankins J.C. (1995) Technology readiness levels / Advanced Concepts Office of Space Access and Technology NASA. http://www.artemisinnovation.com/images/TRL_White_Paper_2004-Edited.pdf.
  7. Moon T., Smith J., Cook S. (2005) Technology Readiness and Technical Risk Assessment for the Australian Defence Organisation.
  8. Mankins J.C. (2009) Technology readiness and risk assessments: A new approach // Acta Astronautica. 65(9-10):1208-1215.
  9. NGNP Risk Management through Assessing Technology Readiness Status (2010) // Idaho National Laboratory. Next Generation Nuclear Plant Project. Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415.
  10. Петров А.Н., Комаров А.В. (2020) Оценка уровня технологической готовности конкурсных заявок с использованием методологии TPRL // Экономика науки. 6(1-2):88-99.
  11. Комаров А.В., Петров А.Н., Сартори А.В. (2018) Модель комплексной оценки технологической готовности инновационных научно-технологических проектов // Экономика науки. 4(1):47-57.
  12. Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J. (2006) Stage-Gate and the Critical Success Factors for New Product Development / BPTrends. https://www.bptrends.com/bpt/wp-content/publicationfiles/07-06-ART-Stage-GateForProductDev-Cooper-Edgett1.pdf.
  13. Сухарев А.А., Власенко А.О. (2019) Метод формализации выбора вариантов реализации комплексного научно-технологического проекта (на примере планирования разработки технологий создания перспективных региональных самолетов) // Друкеровский вестник. 4:126-139.
  14. Chuck A. (2018) Parametric Cost and Schedule Modeling for Early Technology Development / The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
  15. Ferguson R., Goldenson D., McCurley J., Stoddard R., Zubrow D., Anderson D. (2011) Quantifying Uncertainty in Early Lifecycle Cost Estimation (QUELCE) / Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis (SEMA) Cost Estimation Research Group.
  16. USAF Cost Risk and Uncertainty Analysis Handbook (2007).
  17. NASA Cost Estimating Handbook (CEH) v. 4 (2007) // NASA OCFO. https://www.nasa.gov/offices/ocfo/nasa-cost-estimating-handbook-ceh.
  18. El-Khoury B., Kenley C.R. (2014) An AssumptionsBased Framework for TRL-Based Cost and Schedule Models // Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics. 7(3):160-179.
  19. Dubos G.F., Saleh J.H., Braun R. (2007) Technology Readiness Level, Schedule Risk and Slippage in Spacecraft Design: Data Analysis and Modeling // AIAA SPACE 2007 Conference & Exposition. Long Beach, California. 18-20 September 2007.
  20. Garg T., Eppinger S., Joglekar N., Olechowski A. (2017) Using TRLs and System Architecture to Estimate Technology Integration Risk / 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED17. 21-25 August, 2017.
  21. Engel D.W., Dalto A.C., Anderson K.K., Sivaramakrishnan C., Lansing C. (2012) Development of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Metrics and Risk Measures / OSTI. URL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1067968. DOI:10.2172/1067968. 2012.
  22. ГОСТ Р 50779.21-96 (1997) Статистические методы. Правила определения и методы расчета статистических характеристик по выборочным данным. Часть 1. Нормальное распределение / Техэксперт. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200001380.
  23. Yang K. (2008) Risk Identification: Integration & Ilities (RI3) Guidebook.
  24. Жебель В.В., Комаров А.В., Комаров К.А., Шуртаков К.В. (2018) Программное средство для комплексной оценки технологической готовности инновационных научно-технологических проектов // Экономика науки. 4(1):58-68.

Articles

All articles